The LTB Network Forum

smart contracts on counterparty!!

Back to Metacoin Central

Jump to bottom
Pages: 12


  • page


    Did you see the demo vdo, lol bob wallet,

    see the comment left by Shnoshk


    Actually, that reminded me, I always wondered where cryptographers got the names, Alice, Bob and Eve from. There's an explanation here -

    EDIT: Is Eve generally the 3rd person mentioned in crypto? I don't really remember now! Maybe it's Carol LOL

    The anarch wages his own wars, even when marching in rank and file.
    1 like
  • shawn_j




    Is building bulky layers of duct tape and bungee cords on top of Bitcoin really the way forward?

    so is http just a bulky layer of duct tape on top of tcp/ip?

    Not so bulky, no. Ma Bell and others kept trying to build smart networks for many years, maybe they still do. They kept insisting there's no reason we can't stuff all the fancy features in there. But a generic transport layer is the most useful, devoid of any intelligence except what's actually needed to route traffic. They wanted to bake some of the HTTP functionality into the transport layer! In fact, they knew that everything could be stuffed into the networking layer. Doesn't mean it should though.

    If they built a network that knew all about email and FTP and BitTorrent and so on, would it be better? Well in some ways life would be easier. But our Internet would be brittle. This is not a good design.

    Ethereum has the same philosophy - They're all about that chain, 'bout that chain, no features. For people to imagine and create the next generation gee-whiz Dapps, they could really use a featureless chain, built for applications. The right tool for the job. Dapps'll be primitive until they start to be developed on the 2.0 platforms; low-hanging fruit only IMHO.

    I know you weren't really talking about Dapps or DAOs, but only smart contracts. They can be done on any chain, even Bitcoin, if you grunt hard enough. But we clearly need something more suitable for running applications on. We can try to make Bitcoin be all things to all people, but it won't be good at all of it. That's my 2 millibits :)

    ultiamtely we don't know if these higher layers will work, we'll have to try em & see. in the early LTB interviews with vitalik about etherium, they brought this point up. bitcoin was intentionally left as a basic transfer protocol. satoshi could have allowed full programming/scripting in bitcoin core, but chose not to.. to keep it simple, to limit the attack vectors. adding these new layers will add in that functionality, but will also add in the bloat & the risk. maybe they'll work, maybe they'll have to be changed in some way, maybe they won't work at all.

  • page



    I'm also looking at Bitbay as an interesting development, have you heard of that ?

    I bought some. I am not sure about it though. Really, I just had some BTC on bter that I could afford to lose, so I gambled with Bitbay. That was the last of my trading money!

    Aaaand I lost of my money LOL. I traded change I had on bter from $5 up to $100, but sold back to bitcoin at about $80, and then without even thinking I bought that dumb bitbay coin, even knowing it will likely go down in price. I wanted to buy some more xcp :(

    With BTC falling in price and bitbay falling off a cliff I have about $3 worth of BTC now on bter LOL

    The anarch wages his own wars, even when marching in rank and file.
Jump to top
Pages: 12

Post Reply

Please Login to post a reply to this thread.

© Copyright 2013–2016 The LTB Network. All rights reserved .